Abstract
<p style="margin-right:48px; margin-left:48px; text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="layout-grid-mode:char"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span lang="ZH-CN" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:SimSun">本文采取梵汉对勘的比较法，将《维摩诘经》三种同经异译汉译本和梵文本进行比较分析，主要着重在「前置词为首的复合词」</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">(Prādi)</span></span><span lang="ZH-CN" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:SimSun">。《维摩诘经》是印度早期大乘佛教的重要经典，在中国广泛流传，前后共历七个译本，只有三个译本流传至今。本研究将考察</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">20</span></span><span lang="ZH-CN" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:SimSun">个梵文前缀所组成的「前置词为首的复合词」</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">(Prādi)</span></span><span lang="ZH-CN" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:SimSun">，观察这些前缀如何翻译成汉语，如用「随」翻译</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> anu-</span></span><span lang="ZH-CN" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:SimSun">，用「异」翻译</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> vi-</span></span><span lang="ZH-CN" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:SimSun">，或「恶」翻译</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"> dus-</span></span><span lang="ZH-CN" style="font-size:9.0pt"><span style="font-family:SimSun">。不过，梵文前缀都有多种不同的意思，在汉语都翻译成同一个够词语素，这些构词语素承载了梵文原本的意思，有些是汉语中本身没有的意思。本文希望探讨这些因翻译梵文佛经而新赋予的意思是否也渗透到中土文献，如何影响汉语语素原有的意思。</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>