Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the problem regarding the application of Key Indicator Method checklist (KIM). KIM is a newly developped ergonomical checklist for the assessment of risk factors of work-related musculoskeltal (WMSD). It is easy to use, and therefore is worthwhuile to promote. Nevertheless, because of its simplicity, it is seemed that it can not fully cover the complexity in all sorts of work situation, it appears to have some some shortcomings in the assessment of risk factors. This study is undertaken to use the WMSD prevention technique deelopped by YU et. al in the workplace intervention of “Sandblasting”, “Packing and shipping”, “Knob checking” and “Circular plate drilling” workplaces in a die-casting plant, in the process KIM was used as primary method in the assessment of WMSD risk factors, such as over-exertion, repetitive motion, awardkward posture, tissue compression, and vibration and impaction. The results pointed out several some shortcomings of KIM method, such as “Stoop angle is not clearly defined”, “Subtle hand posture can not be evaluated”, and “Both tissue compression and vibration can not be evaluated”…etc. These findings suggest further study to strengthen the shortcomings of KIM checklist is needed.