Abstract
Abstract Throughout the world today, all over the world are experiencing a new round of energy revolution, this change in China mainland and Taiwan to be reflected. Nearly three decades both China mainland and Taiwan are Committed to the local energy transformation, in the current round, the most important goal is to achieve energy capacity and consumption structure upgrade. In order to coordinate energy transformation and upgrading both China mainland and Taiwan have carried out energy reform, which is the electric power law, renewable energy law and energy management law as the pilot and focus point. The ultimate goal is to achieve low-carbon and green energy transformation, in this process, China's mainland and Taiwan's regulatory authorities from the relevant legal system as the starting point, and timely modification of the old legal system. After 2000, China mainland began to carry out electric power reform, renewable energy system established. In 2009, Taiwan established renewable energy legal system, 2017 with the new "electricity law" as an opportunity, Taiwan officially began the process of electric power liberalization. Looking back over the years of energy reform and development process, we want ask that what is China’s mainland and Taiwan’s the energy law system? What is the degree of development? What is the legal system and architecture?What are the problems and difficulties faced by practice? What is the difference energy law system between China mainland and Taiwan? With this kind of problem, this paper analyzes and studies these problems from the three kinds of legal systems, the renewable energy legal system, the electric power legal system and the energy management legal system, which are the most closely related to the transformation of low carbon and green energy. The main lines along the two research path to start, legal system and practice, then try to explore the above topic. This paper conclude the three major legal systems related to the transformation of low carbon and green energy on China mainland and Taiwan, and conclude the contents of the legislation and legal system, the current legal structure and its main contents and typical system. And on this basis, with sufficient material support, and then try to explore the current legal practice effect between China mainland and Taiwan. At the practical level, the paper examines and discusses the current existing problem of legal system between China mainland and Taiwan, the choice of the reform model, the problems faced by the main core system, and the plight of the energy system reform. 3 Through the above conclude, review and discussion, we found that although there are some differences between China mainland and Taiwan, but the core of the legal system is similar,like energy reform model choice, the main typical legal system, practice problems and difficulties, etc., are showing a very similar characteristics.The field of renewable energy is based on FIT model;Recently, the REC system was actively built to try to amendment the FIT mode;Grid company has obligation of 「compulsory contract」;Actively build renewable energy voluntary market;Open direct electricity sales;In practice, the state of the rights and obligations is uncertain when face the grid connected,funds and other common problems;Electricity power system, the China mainland and Taiwan didn’t take the traditional electrical liberalization completely Split the method,all keep the integration at power transmission and distribution field;Giving renewable energy an important role;Faced with problems including rising electricity prices, thermal power plants affected by the energy reform and other issues;Energy management law, both China mainland and Taiwan are energy saving and emission reduction as the core of the system;The overall regulatory approach is similar;Administrative power acts is similar;Are faced a problem that establishment of energy-saving emission reduction system implementation mechanism;Facing the problems of energy efficiency system reform, Cogeneration plant promotion and other problem. This paper Conclusions including ten conclusions, a research experience, appeal for communication.Including but not limited that China mainland and Taiwan energy reform in the system model selection and path is similar;Taiwan's legislation and public participation mechanism is developed;Taiwan's energy law system has the following characteristics, legislation low-carbon,the different law is closely linked, structural system,the law is very systematic;The experience of China mainland energy reform Is worthy of reference for Taiwan;The China mainland energy law system administrative color is strong, highlight the practice-oriented and other suggestions and conclusions;Hope to promote China mainland and Taiwan energy law system of Communication and mutual learning,to promote China mainland and Taiwan energy transformation and upgrading of mutual benefit, gain the energy rights and well-being of people on both China mainland and Taiwan!