Abstract
The research of this thesis focuses on the Monhuai Literature Prize held by Miaoli County Government, and makes analysis of annual prized masterpiece in Reportage part. First of all, the writer takes attention of emerging localist nativism after the Lift of Martial Law, otherwises, there were much more effort on flexible culture policy by every local government after Organization Change of Government. Most of local literature prize originates from era of 1990, and Monhuai Literature Prize commences from 1998. First Monhuai Literature Prize was held by Raiser Literature and Art Association, afterwards, Maioli County Government took over Raiser Literature and Art Association which is a Literature and Art association established by Miaoli local educated people and dedicates to Maioli literature and art. The writer reorganizes related research on literature review on chapter one and finds that most of research on local literature prize illustrates on locialization writing and investigates internal power operation mechanism on literature prize. On chapter two, the writer first analyzes the established development process of Monhuai Literature Prize, naming, transfering of coorganizer, design and limit of general regulation. Ultimately, making analysis on constitute of reportage judges, award winner background, and writing subject. Our thesis illustrates from the vision of ethnic writing and makes concentration on and caring about Hakkanese who has largest popularity in Miaoli County, aborigine who has less popularity, and vulnerable new inhabitant. We also investigate the writing of Hakkanese, aborigine, and new inhabitant. The writer not only analyzes with the text and award winner, but also cites the comments and idea made by Monhuai Literature Prize judges in adequate. The writer sincerely hopes to investigates the Maioli local imagine by judges under the literature prize mechanism from the analysis of comments. There are literariness, news information, and even critical on reportage. From annual prized masterpieces, the writer finds that some writer intergrates the topics of social protest, no matter the disturbance of wind power or investigation the menace of Leopard Cat for development on industrial road, and have deep and wide critical strength. The judges ask the reportage literature masterpiecea to have the problem awareness and focus on kernel question instead of abusing of literature review, live field research in deepth. From this, we could realize that judges hope writers set into the social underprivileged and care about the vlunerable ethnics with problem awareness. Besides, the writer also get the point from the analysis of awarded mastepiece that most of writers take the first person description viewpoint in writing and this leads readers more easily get into author's emotion or thought. With the description of personcharacter in detail and the direct cited description dialogue, it lets readers and judges feel the Live Voice. In Hakkanese writing, the topics focus on traditional cuisine, festival, architecture, skill, religion worship, and figure. Besides it also adequately merges into Hakkanese slang and reveals the Hakkanese subjectivity. In aboriginal writing, it investigates culture taboo, culture heritage, and culture acknowledgement, and make study on aborigine women return to trbie and rally culture or extend the caring point into the aboriginal tribe solitary elders caring. In the writing of new inhabitant, it reveals the affirmative image of new women inhabitants. From the Monhuai Literature Prize complicated mechanism, award masterpieces reveals thick Miaoli locization. From these points, the writers illustrates the judges, award winners, the Maioli ethnic, and local imagine and writing from Loclization, Ethnic, and Critical.