Abstract
In this study the data were collected from Guoyu Ribao;s Loanwords Dictionary (1985). There are 112 Sanskrit words, which have been rendered into 293 Chinese lexical items. We found that of the 293 items, only 20, that is , less than 7%, are not phonetic loans. In fact, out of the 20 loanwords, 18 are hybrids, namely, one part of the compound loanword is a phonetic loan, and the other part is a translated morpheme, or and added semantic marker. In Section 2, we introduce some scholars' classifications of loanwords, and then classify the 293 Sanskrit loanwords, according to Haugen’s (1950), Wu’s (1994) and Chen’s (2000) studies. The Snskrit loanwords are classified into three groups: (1) phonetic loans, for example, 「阿羅漢」; (2) hybrids; which include (a) half-transliteration and half-translation, for example, 「菩提樹」, (b) translation plus a semantic marker, for example, 「須彌山」and (c) double renditions, for example, 「和合僧」; (3) renditions plus added information, for example, 「阿彌陀佛」. In Section 3, several kinds of phonological nativization are presented to show how Chinese scholars transliterated the Sanskrit words. Phonological nativization refers to the use of the most similar native sounds to transliterate the borrowed sounds if the foreign sounds cannot be found in the borrowing languages. We discuss the phonological nativization of the vowels and the phonological nativizaiton of the consonants; the latter is divided into seven aspects; voicing, aspiration, palatal stops, retroflexes, nasals, semivowels and fricatives. Section 4 displays two other processes of the Sinicization of Sanskrit terms: syllable structure Siniciaization and syllable length Sinciazation. Finally, Section 5 gives a brief summary of the paper.