Logo image
Assessment of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in the Left Main Trunk Using Phase-contrast MR Imaging at 3T: Comparison with 15O-labeled Water Positron Emission Tomography
期刊文章

Assessment of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve in the Left Main Trunk Using Phase-contrast MR Imaging at 3T: Comparison with 15O-labeled Water Positron Emission Tomography

Yasuka Kikuchi, Masanao Naya, Noriko Oyama-Manabe, Osamu Manabe, Hiroyuki Sugimori, Kohsuke Kudo, Fumi Kato, Tadao Aikawa, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Nagara Tamaki, …
Magnetic resonance in medical sciences, 卷.18(2), 頁碼.134-141
01/01/2019
PMID: 30047496
Web of Science ID: WOS:000464104800008

摘要

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Science & Technology
Purpose: The aim of this study was to verify coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) on the left main trunk (LMT) in comparison with myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by O-15-labeled water positron emission tomography (PET) (MFR-PET) in both the healthy adults and the patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and to evaluate the feasibility of CFVR to detect CAD. Methods: Eighteen healthy adults and 13 patients with CAD were evaluated. CFVR in LMT was estimated by 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with phase contrast technique. MFR-PET in the LMT territory including anterior descending artery and circumflex artery was calculated as the ratio of myocardial blood flow (MBF)-PET at stress to MBF-PET at rest. Results: There was a significant positive relationship between CFVR and MFR-PET (R = 0.45, P < 0.0001). Inter-observer calculations of CFVR showed good correlation (R-2 = 0.93, P < 0.0001). The CFVR in patients with CAD was significantly lower than that in healthy adults (1.90 +/- 0.61 vs. 2.77 +/- 1.03, respectively, P = 0.01), which were similar to the results of MFR-PET (2.23 +/- 0.84 vs. 3.96 +/- 1.04, respectively, P < 0.0001). For the detection of patients with CAD, the area under the curve was 0.78 (P = 0.01). The sensitivity was 0.77 and specificity was 0.72 when a cut-off of 2.15 was used. Conclusion: CFVR by 3T was validated with MFR-PET. CFVR could detect the patients with CAD. This method is a simple and reliable index without radiation or contrast material.

檔案與連結 (1)

url
https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0003檢視
已出版(紀錄版本) 開放

相關連結

詳細資料

Logo image