Logo image
Comparison of 1:1 And 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping
期刊文章   同儕審查

Comparison of 1:1 And 1:M CSCL environment for collaborative concept mapping

C.-P. Lin, L.-H. WongY.-J. Shao
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 卷.28(2), 頁碼.99-113
04/2012

摘要

Collaborative concept mapping Collaborative learning Computer-aided concept mapping Group scribbles Meaningful learning Education Computer Science Applications
This paper reports an investigation into the effects of collaborative concept mapping in a digital learning environment, in terms of students' overall learning gains, knowledge retention, quality of student artefacts (the collaboratively created concept maps), interactive patterns, and learning perceptions. Sixty-four 12-year-old students from two 6th grade classes (32 from each class) participated in the study. Guided by the methodology of quasi-experimental research, group scribbles 1.0 was adopted in which students carried out collaborative concept mapping activities for social studies in two different settings: (1) 1:1 (one-device-per-student) - students working in pairs with one Tablet PC assigned to each of them; and (2) 1:m (one-device-to-many-students) - multiple students sharing a Tablet PC. Both settings were evaluated and the interactional patterns of the student groups' concept mapping were identified. The results indicated that in both 1:1 and 1:m settings, students had improved their learning results and retention. Nevertheless, while 1:1 groups had demonstrated more consistency in group participation, improved communication and interaction, the 1:m groups had instead generated superior artefacts as all the notes were well discussed among the group members. The findings suggest that a higher quality of collaborative processes does not necessarily lead to improved student artefacts. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

相關連結

指標

1 檢視次數

詳細資料

Logo image