Logo image
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Different Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Long-Acting β2-Agonists in Patients With COPD
期刊文章   開放取用(OA)   同儕審查

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Different Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Long-Acting β2-Agonists in Patients With COPD

Ching-Fu Weng, Chien-Chih Wu, Mei-Hsuan WuFang-Ju Lin
Chest, 卷.163(4), 頁碼.799-814
04/2023
PMID: 36442662

摘要

acute exacerbation cardiovascular event COPD fixed-dose combinations long-acting muscarinic antagonists long-acting β2-agonists Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Background: Researchers have yet to obtain conclusive evidence differentiating among fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) of long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting β 2 -agonists (LABAs) for COPD in terms of real-world clinical outcomes. Research Question: What are the differences between available LAMA/LABA FDCs in the risk of acute exacerbation (AE) and cardiovascular events? Study Design and Methods: This retrospective cohort study based on a national insurance claims database included patients with COPD ≥ 40 years of age who were newly prescribed glycopyrronium (GLY)/indacaterol (IND), umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI), or tiotropium (TIO)/olodaterol (OLO) FDC between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. Propensity score matching and Cox regression models were used to compare outcomes of AE and cardiovascular events associated with LAMA/LABA FDC treatment. Results: Among the 44,498 patients identified and included, 15,586 received GLY/IND, 20,460 received UMEC/VI, and 8,452 received TIO/OLO. Baseline characteristics were well balanced after 1:1 matching of UMEC/VI and GLY/IND, 2:1 matching of UMEC/VI and TIO/OLO, and 2:1 matching of GLY/IND and TIO/OLO. Risk of severe AE was lower among patients treated with UMEC/VI or GLY/IND than among those who received TIO/OLO (UMEC/VI vs TIO/OLO: 17.85 vs 29.32 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; GLY/IND vs TIO/OLO: 15.54 vs 25.53 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.88). In addition, GLY/IND users tended to have a lower risk of cardiovascular events than TIO/OLO users, but the difference dissipated when restricting follow up to a shorter duration. Interpretation: Our results revealed that the risk of severe AE was lower among patients with COPD receiving UMEC/VI or GLY/IND than among those receiving TIO/OLO, whereas the incidence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups but was slightly lower in GLY/IND users when compared with TIO/OLO users. Further research will be required to confirm these findings.

檔案與連結 (1)

url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.027檢視
已出版(紀錄版本) 開放

相關連結

指標

1 檢視次數

詳細資料

Logo image