摘要
The authors regret to state that the y-axis label of Figure 5B is incorrectly labelled in the manuscript and should be in micrometers, (micro-m). The first “m” in “mm” should be a Greek “μ”. As such the unit in the text in Sec 3.4 p. 8806 should read “Accelerated re-epithelialization was statistically greater for the gelatin/PEG hydrogel (6.17 ± 2 μm, p = 0.011) and the MSC–gelatin/PEG biomatrix (6.59 ± 2 μm, p = 0.0041) treatments compared with the sham wound…”. The authors apologise for any inconvenience caused.