Abstract
In regression analysis, RESET has widely been regarded as an effective diagnostic test especially for omitted variables. This paper investigates the limitations of the existing RESET tests in detecting omitted variables. We analyze the sources from which RESET draws its power and point out the circumstances under which RESET will likely be ineffective. We offer some Monte Carlo evidence as well as an empirical application to illustrate the weaknesses of the RESET tests. A more robust RESET type test is proposed. Copyright © 2000 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.