Logo image
Prophylactic Versus Reactive Megestrol Acetate Use for Critical Body Weight Loss in Patients with Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
期刊文章   同儕審查

Prophylactic Versus Reactive Megestrol Acetate Use for Critical Body Weight Loss in Patients with Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Chien-Yu Lin, Pei-Wei Huang, Chia-Hsun Hsieh, Cheng-Lung Hsu, Chi-Ting Liau, Shiang-Fu Huang, Chun-Ta Liao, Tung-Chieh Chang, Hung-Ming Wang 和 Jason Chia-Hsun Hsieh
Nutrition and cancer, 卷.76(7), 頁碼.628-637
08/08/2024
PMID: 38757270
Web of Science ID: WOS:001225614100001

摘要

Adult Aged Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy Chemoradiotherapy - adverse effects Chemoradiotherapy - methods Female Humans Laryngeal Neoplasms - mortality Laryngeal Neoplasms - pathology Laryngeal Neoplasms - therapy Male Megestrol Acetate - therapeutic use Middle Aged Pharyngeal Neoplasms - mortality Pharyngeal Neoplasms - therapy Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck - therapy Weight Loss
This study compared the effects of megestrol acetate (MA) prophylactic (p-MA) versus reactive (r-MA) use for critical body-weight loss (>5% from baseline) during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with advanced pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PLSCC). Patients receiving CCRT alone in two phase-II trials were included for analyses. Both the p-MA and r-MA cohorts received the same treatment protocol at the same institution, and the critical body-weight loss, survival, and adverse event profiles were compared. The mean (SD) weight loss was 5.1% (4.7%) in the p-MA cohort (  = 54) vs. 8.1% (4.6%) in the r-MA cohort (  = 50) (  = .001). The percentage of subjects with body-weight loss >5% was 42.6% in the p-MA cohort vs. 68.0% in the r-MA cohort (  = .011). Tube feeding was needed in 22.2% of p-MA vs. 62.0% of r-MA patients (  < .001). Less neutropenia (26.0% vs. 70.0% [  < .001]) and a shorter duration of grade 3-4 mucositis (2.4 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 2.0 wk [  = .009]) were observed with p-MA treatment. Disease-specific survival, locoregional control, or distant metastasis-free survival did not differ. Less competing mortality from secondary primary cancer resulted in a better overall survival trend in the p-MA cohort. p-MA may reduce body-weight loss and improve adverse event profiles during CCRT for patients with PLSCC.

相關連結

指標

1 檢視次數

詳細資料

Logo image