Logo image
Validation of a wearable system for 3D ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment during manual lifting using instrumented shoes and an inertial sensor suit
期刊文章   開放取用(OA)   同儕審查

Validation of a wearable system for 3D ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment during manual lifting using instrumented shoes and an inertial sensor suit

G.S. Faber, I. Kingma, C.C. Chang, J.T. DennerleinJ.H. van Dieën
Journal of Biomechanics, 卷.102, 109671
03/2020
PMID: 32143885

摘要

Ergonomics Inertial measurement unit (IMU) Occupational biomechanics Spine Wearable sensors Biophysics Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Biomedical Engineering Rehabilitation
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 3D L5/S1 moment estimates from an ambulatory measurement system consisting of a wearable inertial motion capture system (IMC) and instrumented force shoes (FSs), during manual lifting. Reference L5/S1 moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics bottom-up laboratory model ( <sup>bu</sup> LAB <sub>model</sub> ), based on data from a measurement system comprising optical motion capture (OMC) and force plates (FPs). System performance of (1) a bottom-up ambulatory model ( <sup>bu</sup> AMB <sub>model</sub> ) using lower-body kinematic IMC and FS data, and (2) a top-down ambulatory model ( <sup>td</sup> AMB <sub>model</sub> ) using upper-body kinematic IMC data and hand forces (HFs) were compared. HFs were estimated using full-body kinematic IMC data and FS forces. Eight males and eight females lifted a 10-kg box from different initial vertical/horizontal positions using either a free or an asymmetric lifting style. As a measure of system performance, root-mean-square (RMS) errors were calculated between the reference ( <sup>bu</sup> LAB <sub>model</sub> ) and ambulatory ( <sup>td</sup> AMB <sub>model</sub> & <sup>bu</sup> AMB <sub>model</sub> ) moments. The results showed two times smaller errors for the <sup>td</sup> AMB <sub>model</sub> (averaged RMS errors < 20 Nm or 10% of peak extension moment) than for the <sup>bu</sup> AMB <sub>model</sub> (average RMS errors < 40 Nm or 20% of peak extension moment). In conclusion, for ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment with an IMC + FS system, using a top-down inverse dynamics approach with estimated hand forces is to be preferred over a bottom-up approach.

檔案與連結 (1)

url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109671檢視
已出版(紀錄版本) 開放

相關連結

指標

1 檢視次數

詳細資料

Logo image