Logo image
When does activism benefit well-being? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Clinton voters in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election
期刊文章   開放取用(OA)

When does activism benefit well-being? Evidence from a longitudinal study of Clinton voters in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election

Patrick C. Dwyer, Yen-Ping Chang, Jason HannaySara B. Algoe
PLoS ONE, 卷.14(9), e0221754
09/2019
PMID: 31487304

摘要

Biochemistry Genetics and Molecular Biology (all) Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all) Multidisciplinary
Contrary to the expectations of many, Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The initial shock to her supporters turned into despair for most, but not everyone was affected equally. We draw from the literature on political activism, identity, and self-other overlap in predicting that not all Clinton voters would be equivalently crushed by her loss. Specifically, we hypothesize that pre-election measures of political activism, and level of self-other identification between participants and Clinton–that is, how much a person was “with her”–will interact to predict the level of distress of Clinton voters two months later. Longitudinal data support our hypothesis. Notably, among Clinton voters, greater activism negatively predicted depressive symptoms, and positively predicted sleep quality, but only when participants were highly identified with Clinton. We discuss the implications of the results for theory and research on social action and well-being.

檔案與連結 (1)

url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221754檢視
已出版(紀錄版本) 開放

相關連結

指標

1 檢視次數

詳細資料

Logo image