Abstract
The initiation of modern private international law is at about the same time with the saturation of the Nation-State oriented public international law. Certain confluence issues of each other evidenced this historical context. With the advance of theories than judicial practice in the sphere of private international law, borrowing and re-contemplation of the thesis of public international law for the former become inevitable, which makes the thesis of public international law a necessary cogent section of private international law. However, these confluence issues are rarely discussed in local reference due to the very limited judicial practice. With the newly introduced amended Act for the Applicable Laws for the Civil Legal Relations with Foreign Elements and its innovative rules pertaining to the crosscuts such as the civil capacity, non-territorial conflict, inter-temporal conflict, les lois des police, and international jurisdiction, interpretation and application can no longer be conducted coherently without referring to the confluence thesis. Systemized and supplemental thinking close connected with public international law is therefore needed. This article is intending to deplore certain workable formulae, from the perspective of public international law, as a foundation to initiate the requsite new rules, as well as to further rationalize the process of private international law.