Logo image
《百家註分類東波詩》評價之再商榷─以王文誥註家分類說為中心的討論
Journal article   Open access

《百家註分類東波詩》評價之再商榷─以王文誥註家分類說為中心的討論

華藝線上圖書館 臺大文史哲學報, (63), pp.1-33
01/11/2005

Abstract

百家註;百家姓氏;王十朋;蘇軾;王文誥;Hundred Critics' Annotations;The Hundred Annotators' Names;Wan Shi-pong;Su Shih;Wang Wen-gou

Under the stereotypical impression as a forged publication made by booksellers, the ”Classified Poetry of Dongpo with Hundred Critics' Annotations” (abbr. as ”Hundred Critics' Annotations”) was hardly respected except as a rich collection of documents for hundreds of years. In fact, not only whether the Hundred Critics' Annotations is completely a forged book made by booksellers remains discussible; but as one of the most important annotation books for Dongpo's poetry that survived from Song Dynasty, its historical significance was irreplacable by later works or journal paperss, even if they are more precise or profound than it. Based on the reorganization and classification of the so-called ”the Hundred Annotators' Names” made by Wang Wen-gou, a Ching Dynasty scholar, this article attempts to relate the Hundred Annotators to Wang Shi-pong (who was once identified as the editor of the book), to the Jiangxi poets, and to some of the most important academic and political elites in the transition period of Northern and Southern Song. The study, then, helps to reevaluate the significance of the ”Hundred Critics' Annotations” for the research of Su Shih and cultural history of Song Dynasty, as well as puts forth some valuable propositions for further reseach.

pdf
百家註分類東坡詩》評價之再商榷:以王文誥註家分類說為中心的討論.pdfDownloadView
Open Access

Related links

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image