Abstract
The article aims to analyze The Cambridge Primary Review (2010). After explaining how the report is made, the recommendations of the Report are discussed in contrast with the background of British education. These are twelve aims for primary education, decentralization in administration, 30% of national curriculum replaced by community curriculum, alternative form for generalist class teaching, entrance age from 5 extend to 6, assessment should aim at learning improvement rather than accountability, revise inspection standards, headteacher focus on leading learning, teacher training based on demands of primary school teaching etc. The Report is between the evaluation of the status quo and education reform. It is initiated by civil society, not an official report. The Report is based on education ideal which takes that high quality teaching as the most important. It should be based on a good curriculum which originated from the twelve aims of primary education. Assessment and teacher training are subject to the need of teaching. Administration is also for the support of teaching. The Report insists on educational ideal which has been criticized by the government. However, this Report should be welcomed for its reasonable recommendations.