Logo image
電腦化注意力測驗(CADA)建置與ADHD學生注意力分析之探討
Journal article

電腦化注意力測驗(CADA)建置與ADHD學生注意力分析之探討

瑛如 孟 and 吟文 簡
特教論壇, (22), pp.26-47
06/2017

Abstract

注意力、注意力缺陷過動症、特殊教育、電腦化注意力診斷測驗
<p style="margin-right:40px; margin-left:40px; text-align:justify; text-indent:24.0pt"><span style="font-size:12pt"><span style="text-justify:inter-ideograph"><span style="punctuation-wrap:simple"><span style="font-family:&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,serif"><span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">本研究目的在發展建置電腦化注意力診斷測驗之線上平台,提出診斷注意力向度之模式,同時瞭解</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">學生與一般學生在注意力表現上的差異。測驗內容根據注意力相關理論編製,共分為</span>10<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">個分測驗,同時經模式驗證分類為三個因素分數:圖畫注意力、推理注意力與語文注意力。測驗經過預試修正題目,並選取學前到國中階段共計</span>250<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">位參與者進行正式試並建立常模與</span>CADA<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">商數,本研究所發展之</span>CADA<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">內部一致信度為</span>.824<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">,因素分數與總分相關皆大於</span>.7<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">,三項因素建構效度為</span>.766<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">、</span>.742<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">以及</span>.856<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">。本研究在分析正式試後得到下列結果:</span>1.<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">本研究發展之</span>CADA<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">具有良好信效度,對注意力之解釋能結合特殊教育應用;</span>2.<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">一般學生在注意力表現上會隨著教育階段而提高</span>(p &lt; 0.1)<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">;</span>3.ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">學生的</span>CADA<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">商數會顯著低於一般學生,三項因素中圖畫和推理兩項注意力分數達顯著差異</span>(p &lt; 0.5)<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">;</span>4.<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">比較服藥與未服藥之</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">學生注意力表現,未服用藥物之</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">學生除</span>CADA<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">商數低於服用藥物之</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">學生,三項因素分數在數據呈現上也都低於服藥之</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">,同時以語文注意力的數據差距最多,顯示藥物對於</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">與本測驗之注意力表現可能存在影響,唯本次</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">抽樣數乃依照自然出現率(</span>5<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">%)進行抽樣,尚無法對於</span>ADHD<span style="font-family:&quot;新細明體&quot;,serif">用藥與否之表現差異進行確切推論,有待後續進一步再研究探討。本研究最後根據研究結果提出相關建議,提供教育與研究人員在測驗使用與結果解釋之參考</span></span></span></span></span></p>

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

Logo image